{"id":70,"date":"2013-07-15T12:05:53","date_gmt":"2013-07-15T12:05:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/?p=70"},"modified":"2013-07-15T12:05:53","modified_gmt":"2013-07-15T12:05:53","slug":"caution-et-mention-manuscrite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/?p=70","title":{"rendered":"Caution et mention manuscrite"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>La &#8220;page d&#8217;\u00e9criture&#8221; impos\u00e9e aux cautions lors de la souscription d&#8217;un pr\u00eat revient fr\u00e9quemment plusieurs ann\u00e9es apr\u00e8s, lorsque la mention manuscrite est alors scrut\u00e9e &#8220;\u00e0 la loupe&#8221; par les avocats lors de la mise en jeu des engagements.<\/p>\n<p>Il s&#8217;agit parfois d&#8217;une virgule ou d&#8217;une erreur mat\u00e9rielle que la Cour de Cassation refuse de sanctionner trop durement depuis un arr\u00eat de 2004 repris par deux d\u00e9cisions intervenues en avril 2011 (09-14358 et 10-16426).<\/p>\n<p>En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce la caution avait recopi\u00e9 la mention figurant \u00e0 l&#8217;article L.313-17 du code de la consommation applicable aux cautions simples (tr\u00e8s rarement souscrites) en ajoutant le mot solidaire alors que le texte applicable figure \u00e0 l&#8217;article L 313-8 du code de la consommation.<\/p>\n<p>Quelle sanction \u00e9tait applicable? La nullit\u00e9 de la caution?<\/p>\n<p>Le Tribunal d&#8217;instance avait sanctionn\u00e9 le pr\u00eateur en consid\u00e9rant que la caution ne pouvait \u00eatre que simple et non solidaire.<\/p>\n<p>C&#8217;est la solution retenue par la Cour de Cassation qui adopte une solution &#8220;souple&#8221; en ne sanctionnant pas par la nullit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Cass civ 1\u00e8re 5 avril 2012 n\u00b011-12515<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La &#8220;page d&#8217;\u00e9criture&#8221; impos\u00e9e aux cautions lors de la souscription d&#8217;un pr\u00eat revient fr\u00e9quemment plusieurs ann\u00e9es apr\u00e8s, lorsque la mention manuscrite est alors scrut\u00e9e &#8220;\u00e0 la loupe&#8221; par les avocats lors de la mise en jeu des engagements. Il s&#8217;agit parfois d&#8217;une virgule ou d&#8217;une erreur mat\u00e9rielle que la Cour de Cassation refuse de sanctionner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publications"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=70"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":71,"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions\/71"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=70"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=70"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cbavocats.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=70"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}